Regression trees, unlike their classification counterparts, operate on a different mathematical principle, focusing on minimizing variance rather than achieving purity in leaf nodes. While classification trees employ the Gini coefficient for purity assessment, regression trees aim to diminish variance as they traverse down the tree structure.
In regression tree analysis, the objective revolves around predicting scale target variables, exemplified by the illustration of miles per gallon. The algorithm endeavors to identify branches where the distribution of the target variable becomes increasingly tall and slender, akin to a positively kurtotic distribution. This transformation indicates a reduction in standard deviation and a convergence of cases, thereby reducing variation.
Unlike classification trees, where pure leaf nodes signify all instances belonging to one category, regression trees seek to achieve a tall, skinny distribution indicative of reduced variance. This statistical phenomenon mirrors the concept of positive kurtosis, wherein the distribution becomes more peaked and less dispersed.
The crux of regression trees lies in the endeavor to minimize variance throughout the tree structure. Rather than employing the Gini calculation for purity assessment, regression trees strive to transform the initial bell curve shape into positively kurtotic distributions at the leaf nodes, effectively reducing variation and enhancing predictive accuracy.
Understanding the statistical mechanics behind regression trees illuminates the nuanced approach to predictive modeling. While classification trees prioritize purity, regression trees prioritize variance reduction, offering a unique perspective in predictive analytics. This insight underscores the importance of tailoring modeling techniques to the nature of the target variable and the objectives of the analysis.
Tác giả Hồ Đức Duy. © Sao chép luôn giữ tác quyền
