In the field of natural language processing (NLP), the segmentation of text into smaller units known as tokens has become crucial and indispensable. Tokenization methods offer a flexible and diverse approach to understanding and processing language, each method bringing its own advantages and limitations.
One of the most common tokenization methods is word tokenization, where sentences or text are divided into separate words based on a predefined vocabulary. While this method is simple and easy to implement, it faces challenges when dealing with out-of-vocabulary (OOV) words. The quantity of OOV words in a corpus and the size of the vocabulary relative to the language dictionary are relevant quantitative measures.
Another method is character tokenization, where text is divided into individual characters. This method doesn’t require a predefined vocabulary but lacks any meaningful relationships between characters, making it unsuitable for most NLP tasks due to a lack of semantic understanding. The complexity of determining optimal character units and processing time compared to other methods are quantitative values to consider.
Lastly, sub-word tokenization divides text into words and then into sub-word forms. This method allows capturing morphological information and provides better vocabulary coverage compared to word tokenization. The percentage of improvement in vocabulary coverage over word tokenization, along with the reduction in OOV words in dependent tasks, are specific quantitative values.
Through thorough comparison and analysis of tokenization methods, it’s evident that each method has its own benefits and limitations. In practice, combining these methods can enhance performance and flexibility in natural language processing. This underscores the importance of understanding and selecting the appropriate tokenization method for each specific situation in the field of NLP.
Tác giả Hồ Đức Duy. © Sao chép luôn giữ tác quyền
